Nasa hacker – CPS refusal

CPS refused prosecution on the ground that most of the evidence rests in the US, which obviously would cost a fortune to bring back to the UK. However, I don’t fully understand the decision, given that McKinnon confessed and thus showed his intention to plead guilty. If he pleas guilty, there is more or less no assessment of evidence, thus whether it’s in the US or not does not matter. If I am right, then it raises the question of why the CPS does not want to prosecute and are happy to leave their American colleagues facing the burden of proof…

Nasa hacker closer to extradition after CPS refusal ” (ZDNet.co.uk, 26 February 2009)
Parliamentary support builds for Nasa hacker ” (ZDnet.co.uk, 25 February 2009)

About Audrey Guinchard

Senior Lecturer @ University of Essex (UK)
This entry was posted in Offences - Hacking - Mr. McKinnon (Nasa hacker)'s case. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s