Welcome to Cybercrime Laws!
This blog is part of my cybercrime module taught currently at the University of Essex (UK). I see it as a database with which I, and others, can work.
The updates are not daily, partly because of lack of time, partly because it is easier to group similar subjects in one post after a week or so. RSS feeds (and sharing) are available.
The original blog was on Blogger (blogspot.com), but for maintenance purposes, transfer to Wordpress became necessary. The original blog is still up and running (I just import/export posts)
Archives
- May 2013
- February 2013
- September 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- March 2012
- September 2011
- August 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- February 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
Categories
- Anonymity
- Anonymous and Co
- censorship
- Cloud_computing
- Corporate Responsibility
- Council of Europe
- Countries – China
- Countries – France
- Countries – UK
- Countries – US
- Cyberwar
- Data retention
- Discipline
- Drones
- Education
- Encryption
- EU policy
- Filtering
- Freedom of speech
- Gaming
- General – Cost(s) of cybercrime
- General – Criminalisation
- General – Cybercrime patterns
- General – Legal/non legal responses to cybercrime
- Human Rights
- Information – reliability
- Investigation-1- Police forces (training)
- Investigation-2- Interception of communication
- Investigation-3- Miscelleanous
- Investigation-4- Searches and seizures
- Investigation-5- Use of technology(ies)
- Jurisdiction
- Offences – Child pornography
- Offences – CMA s.3A
- Offences – Conspiracy
- Offences – Defamation
- Offences – Forgery
- Offences – Fraud
- Offences – Hacking (unauthorised access)
- Offences – Hacking – Mr. McKinnon (Nasa hacker)'s case
- Offences – Harassment
- Offences – Incitement/provocation
- Offences – Obscenity
- Offences – Piracy
- Offences – Terrorism
- Offences – Theft
- Offences – Unauthorised 'modification' (and co)
- Offences – Violence against the person
- Prevention – Security
- Privacy
- Providers as law enforcement agents
- Providers' liability
- Scarcity
- Sentencing
- Social networking
- Social networking – Facebook
- Social networking – Twitter
- Spamming
- Surveillance
- Technology – neither good or bad but never neutral
- Trial – Evidence
- Trial – Judges
- Trial – Jury
- Trial – or mediation
- Trial – Right to
- Trial – Training of judges
- Uncategorized
- United Nations
- Virtual Worlds
Monthly Archives: January 2010
“Supreme Court Says No Cameras In The Courtroom” (TechDirt 14 January 2010) Advertisements
Posted in Countries - US, Trial - Judges
Leave a comment
this sounds mad. I’ll have to investigate what French reviews report “French Court Forcing Google To Remove Word ‘Scam’ From Google Suggest” (TechDirt, 14 January 2010)
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Copyrights bill in the UK
Sorry but don’t have time right now to analyse: “Lord Lucas Proposes That Copyright Holders Detail Actual Damages From Infringement Under Mandelson Bill” (TechDirt, 7 january 2010) “UK Ministers ‘Concede’ Some Ridiculous Points in Digital Economy Bill In Attempt To … Continue reading
Posted in Countries - UK, Offences - Piracy, Sentencing
Leave a comment
Use of social networking
The tweet was silly, but the reaction to it is no better. Everything is out of proportion on both sides. Maybe we should set a course for both on how to use Twitter and social networking? “UK Man Arrested And … Continue reading
Censorship: Google/China and others
Obviously, the headlines for the past 10 days are aboug Google’s declaration and movement of withdrawal from China, but as pointed out, well, if Google withdraws from China, why not other countries like India, Australia, Saudi Arabia, Russia…? “Google Considers … Continue reading
New report in France to reflect on digital economy
Well, I have just scrolled through the report and the least we can say is that the committee did not really engage with the issues at a deep level. The report is disappointing:– for a summary in English, “France’s Latest … Continue reading
Privacy, piracy, copyrights and censorship
The theme of the week seems to turn around protecting privacy. “Hacking Surpassing Human Error For Data Breaches?” (TechDirt, 19 January 2010). For the author, the answer is actually positive: hacking is a major threat, more that insiders leaking data. … Continue reading
View of the blog via Wordle
I use Wordle (http://www.wordle.net/create) to copy text from the blog (minus my name and the main sources TechDirt, ZDnet.co.uk as it is irrelevant to what I wanted) in order to get an idea of which words were recurring in the … Continue reading
Posted in General - Cybercrime patterns
Leave a comment
telegraph and newspapers
The telegraph was feared, like today the internet is. But the threat only comes from refusing to embrace the new technology. “How The Telegraph Was Supposed To Kill The Newspaper Business” (TechDirt, 22 December 2009)
Impartiality of judges
I found it a bit extreme to forbid the use of facebook. It is even hypocrite when one knows that judges and practitionners know each other quite well in real life, especially in the US and the UK where solicitors … Continue reading
Posted in Countries - US, Trial - Judges
Leave a comment
