Copyrights: our level of acceptance in surveillance and prosecution techniques

Self-explanatory and completely in line to my point of view about the level and type of surveillance we accept online being disproportionate to what we would tolerate offline; it is like the spirit of the Enlightenment being swallowed by the new technologies.

Would UK Politicians Support The Digital Economy Bill If It Applied To Offline Activities As Well?” TechDirt, 19 March 2010

It is especially worrying when one sees those types of headlines and attitudes:

More ACTA Leaks: Would Create Special Organization To Manage Worldwide Copyright Laws“, TechDirt, 19 March 2010

EU Proposes Criminalizing Inducing Infringement In ACTA Draft; Could Outlaw Google“, TechDirt, 18 March 2010 – it is the EU commission, not the Parliament; and it continues the general trend in EU Law of wanting to edict criminal sanctions whereas criminal law is not supposed to be a competence for the EU institutions

If ACTA Gets Approved, Expect China To Use It As Justification For Censorship” – TechDirt, 19 March 2010 – well China will indeed always use whatever possible to reinforce surveillance

About Audrey Guinchard

Senior Lecturer @ University of Essex (UK)
This entry was posted in Countries - China, Investigation-4- Searches and seizures, Offences - Piracy, Surveillance, Trial - Right to. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s